Real SEO Results Across 3 Sites: What the Search Console Data Shows
Direct answer
Three sites built on different stacks —one on Wix Studio, two on Astro— show verifiable organic results in Google Search Console: average position between 4.6 and 9.2 (the lower the number, the higher the site ranks on Google) and up to 706 cumulative organic clicks on a single project. None of the figures below are estimates: every number comes directly from each property’s Search Console performance report, for the time window noted.
Comparison
| Project | Stack | Measured window | Organic clicks | Impressions | Avg. CTR | Avg. position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seguros Aura | Wix Studio | 16 months (Mar 2025–Jun 2026) | 288 | 16,500 | 1.7% | 9.2 |
| MiuraBox | Astro | 10 months (Sep 2025–Jun 2026) | 88 | ~1,000 | 8.8% | 7.8 |
| Monono Café | Astro + TypeScript | 11 months (Sep 2025–Aug 2026) | 706 | 19,400 | 3.6% | 4.6 |
What explains the difference between cases
The three sites sit in different industries and stages, so comparing them isn’t about “which technique wins”: it’s about what combination of factors produces what result.
- MiuraBox has the highest CTR (8.8%) with the lowest impression volume. Consistent with a niche brand where someone searching the exact name already has click intent, but the total search volume for that niche is smaller.
- Monono Café has the largest absolute volume (706 clicks, 19,400 impressions) and the best average position (4.6). It’s local SEO for a physical business in Querétaro, a category with less competition from large domains than the insurance sector.
- Seguros Aura has the largest impression volume relative to its CTR (1.7%). Mexico’s insurance sector has high competition from already-established brands, which pushes CTR down even when the site appears frequently in results.
- Stack choice (Wix Studio vs. Astro) is not, by itself, the biggest factor behind the difference. Astro gives more technical control over load times, structured data, and content architecture, but that control is a necessary condition, not a sufficient one: without an SEO strategy behind it, the framework alone doesn’t generate traffic.
One more case: AI engine queries
Of the three, Seguros Aura is the only case with an explicit GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) strategy on top of traditional SEO: structured data and AI-response-optimized content that let ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude actively index the site. As of June 2026, the site was receiving 34 AI-engine queries per month. That’s still small next to its traditional organic search traffic, but it’s real traffic Search Console doesn’t report natively —it was tracked separately— and it’s the first measurable sign that these engines are already sending visits, not just mentions.
How this data was verified
Every figure in the table comes from the Search Console performance report for the corresponding property, filtered to the time window shown. These aren’t estimates or industry averages. Full detail on each case, including the month-over-month trend chart and verification method, is on its individual case study page.